Traveling Inside Richard Fisher’s Gut.

Side note: I haven’t seen it since I was a kid, but I vaguely remember Innerspace being one of the greatest movies ever. Worth revisiting?

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Richard Fisher, Today, signaling he may vote against QEII (my bold):

“Having done our job, I see many risks to the Fed overstaying its welcome,” Fisher said during the Society of American Business Editors and Writers 2011 Annual Conference.

“Inflationary impulses are gaining ground in the rest of the world,” he said. With businesses grappling with higher commodity prices, “my gut tells me that this will result in some unpleasant general price inflation numbers in the next few reporting periods,” and “there is the risk that we might breach our duty to hold inflation at bay.”

Fisher also checked his gut in March, 2008, right before Bear Sterns collapsed (my bold):

Here, of course, I refer to the potential harm to the consumer and the business and financial sectors alike by unwittingly allowing the perception to take hold that, as the New York Times editorialized in its lead front page article last Thursday, “the Federal Reserve, signaled [its] readiness … to bolster the economy with cheaper money even though inflation is picking up speed.”[2] Talk of “cheap money” makes my skin crawl. The words imply a debased currency and inflation and the harsh medicine that inevitably must be administered to purge it. So you should not be surprised that I consider the perception that the Fed is pursuing a cheap-money strategy, should it take root, to be a paramount risk to the long-term welfare of the U.S. economy….

…We cannot, in my opinion, confidently assume that slower U.S. economic growth will quell U.S. inflation and, more important, keep inflationary expectations anchored. Containing inflation is the purpose of the ship I crew for, and if a temporary economic slowdown is what we must endure while we achieve that purpose, then it is, in my opinion, a burden we must bear, however politically inconvenient. To some, this may appear a Hobson’s choice. I don’t see it that way. Our obligation is to prevent inflation in order to sustain long-term employment growth. I believe that the best way to cut through the treacherous economic waves that are upon us and keep our ship steaming forward is to stick to our purpose. [Speech, March 4, 2008]

With the economy about to go into the deepest recession since the Great Depression, with shadow banking runs starting to rev up, with massive deflationary pressures being put on the entire economy, Fisher’s gut tells him to fight inflation.

He also was worried about inflationary pressures last August. And every single other time anyone has ever heard him speak.  How’s inflation doing during this time period?

Keynes changed his mind on monetary policy, giving us the great quote “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” Will any of the regional bankers actually change their minds to re-learn old facts?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Traveling Inside Richard Fisher’s Gut.

  1. Frank says:

    Isn’t the real hyperinflation threat the ability of banks to use CDS to endlessly create more buying power?

    Haven’t the Feds stopped even trying to measure the money supply?

    Given that banks seem to be able to endlessly leverage by using derivatives to get around capital requirements, shouldn’t we be worried that they’ll keep bidding commodities, etc, up?

  2. Michael Perhac, CFP says:

    I find it interesting that you are displaying a chart for CPU-U minus food and energy. If you were trying to be unbiased, I would think you would display CPU-U at the very least.

  3. Lark Williams says:

    The charts are flawed since the Treasury long ago changed the definition of inflation. Through substitution, hedonics and weighting they have successively lowered inflation estimates. For readers who want the truth, see The politicians have been lying about inflation. Shocking — politicians lying. Can’t be!

  4. JTapp says:

    DeLong did a post on this a while back, but there is not any real proof (according to Skidelsky and others) that Keynes actually said that.

    I met Fisher once in person. He’s an intimidating guy. I can imagine he gets pretty red-faced at the table. Do you read his monthly letters? They read like some hedge fund manager, opining and preachy and colorful.
    That Bernanke doesn’t have more support on the BoG is Obama’s unforced error.

  5. Pingback: The Fed Dissenters, Or: Examining Narayana Kocherlakota’s Gut. | Rortybomb

  6. Pingback: Macroeconomics in action | Matt Rognlie

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s