The Young Are #OccupyingWallStreet Because They Have the Most to Lose

This Occupy Wall Street sign is my favorite:

The sign has a clever double meaning.  The young have the most to lose by standing idle and not having their voices heard in the political process, and they have the most to lose by actually being idle — or unemployed.

The media hasn’t learned the lessons from the 1960s, as there is still a tendency to dismiss young people protesting because they are young. You can see this phenomenon in the original New York Times coverage, and it appears in much of the rest. But at the heart of dismissals of young college kids in the 1960s was the idea that they had a very bright future ahead of them that they were taking for granted. For instance, here’s President Nixon in the New York Times, May 1970:

You know, you see these bums, you know, blowin’ up the campuses. Listen, the boys that are on the college campuses today are the luckiest people in the world, going to the greatest universities, and here they are, burnin’ up the books, I mean, stormin’ around about this issue, I mean you name it — get rid of the war, there’ll be another one.

Can it be argued that young people, college educated or not, are particularly lucky in this recession? Every category of worker is doing terribly in the Lesser Depression. My former editor Derek Thompson has a must-read article, “Who’s Had the Worst Recession: Boomers, Millennials, or Gen-Xers?,” which compares the three age categories across employment, income and wealth, and finds that everyone is suffering across the board.

But let’s focus on the young. The issue of debt, especially student debt, hovers over the protests. How is the employment ratio looking for young people with a college degree? Here’s data from last year:

And that doesn’t factor in the fact that many college educated workers are working jobs that don’t require college degrees. They are essentially using their degrees to crowd out those with a high school diploma or some college education from the jobs they would normally take. And no matter what jobs they are able to get, student debt hangs around their necks like an albatross.

This impacts everyone who is young. Here’s a summary of the recent 2010 Census’ American Community Survey by PBS:

  • Employment among young adults between the ages of 16 to 29 was at its lowest level since the end of World War II. Just 55 percent were employed, compared with 67 percent in 2000.
  • Nearly 6 million Americans between the ages of 25 to 34 lived in their parents’ homes last year.
  • Young men are nearly twice as likely as women to live with their parents.
  • Marriages among young adults hit a new low. Just 44 percent of Americans in that age group were married last year.
  • Other trends were also headed in the wrong direction. In 43 of the 50 largest metro areas — often a magnet for 20-and-30-somethings — employment declined.

In our desperate bid to replicate Japan, we are also replicating the poverty and joblessness among Japanese youths. This 2010 AOL article, “Japan’s Economic Stagnation Is Creating a Nation of Lost Youths,” can give you a sense of our trajectory.

Will we get our own version of the hikikomori? Young people are doubling up and not moving out of their parents’ houses in this recession. If we looked at solely their own income, their poverty rates would be astounding. From the Census Bureau:

These “doubled-up” households are defined as those that include at least one “additional” adult — in other words, a person 18 or older who is not enrolled in school and is not the householder, spouse or cohabiting partner of the householder…

In spring 2007, there were 19.7 million doubled-up households, amounting to 17.0 percent of all households. Four years later, in spring 2011, the number of such households had climbed to 21.8 million, or 18.3 percent…

Young adults were especially hard-hit, with 5.9 million people ages 25 to 34 living in their parents’ household in 2011, up from 4.7 million before the recession. That left 14.2 percent of young adults living in their parents’ households in March 2011, up more than two percentage points over the period.

These young adults who lived with their parents had an official poverty rate of only 8.4 percent, since the income of their entire family is compared with the poverty threshold. If their poverty status were determined by their own income, 45.3 percent would have had income falling below the poverty threshold for a single person under age 65.

Even if we can ever move out of the short-term recession, it will impact young people for years to come. Looking at a research summary compiled previously by Roosevelt Institute super-intern Charlie Eisenhood, Beaudry and DiNardo (1991) found “that every percentage increase in the [national] unemployment rate is associated with a 3-7 percent drop in entry-level contract wages.” Kahn (2009) found an estimate on the high end of that spectrum, discovering an “initial wage loss of 6 to 7% for a 1 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate measure.”

Unfortunately, the recession’s effect is not limited just to the initial job search and wages. The negative impact persists far beyond that. Kahn found that the effect “falls in magnitude by approximately a quarter of a percentage point each year after college graduation. However, even 15 years after college graduation, the wage loss is 2.5% and is still statistically significant.”

Job mobility is also affected. Kahn found a “negative correlation between the national unemployment rate and occupational attainment (measured by a prestige score) and a slight positive correlation between the national rate and tenure.” She concludes that “workers who graduate in bad economies are unable to fully shift into better jobs after the economy picks up.” Worse, Oreopoulos found permanent wage effects on workers with low expected earnings (based on occupational prestige).

So yes, young people have an important stake in what happens going forward. Do we continue policies that benefit Wall Street and the top 1 percent? Do we tax the rich to rebuild America? Do we reform a financial sector that dominates the economy? The list of choices in front of us goes on and on. Their whole future, indeed all of ours, depends on it. It’s no wonder that they’ve taken to the streets.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Young Are #OccupyingWallStreet Because They Have the Most to Lose

  1. Pingback: Occupy Wall Street Blog Round-Up, and a Thought on Climate Change « A (Budding) Sociologist’s Commonplace Book

  2. Sandi says:

    My 27 year old has been working at a job below what her degree prepared her for. I can attest to the feelings of uncertainty and concern. She had just married, her husband had a new job, when the recession hit. He was let go soon after (last in, first out), and now is in year two of running his own business. They are living pay-check to paycheck, paying the mortgage and student loans, and some credit card debt. They would love to move to a larger city, but they bought their house just before the market tanked and would take a beating. So, they hunker down and wait – and hope.

  3. Pingback: Some quick Occupy Wall Street links « zunguzungu

  4. Jeff V says:

    I graduated 10 years ago into a crappy job market with high student loan debt… this is an old story, but it seems to be getting worse.

  5. R.G. Fishman says:

    College grads with legitimate concerns: Debt without work. Nevertheless, getting sucked into the maelstrom of creating chaos in order to ‘bring down the system’ should not be confused with supporting candidates in this primary year, who have a vision to shape policy to remedy their indebtedness or unemployment.
    Some (Van Jones) are calling for an American Autumn, to become our version of Arab Spring. The pattern of Tahrir Square, London is being introduced in American cities. That being to use people with legitimate grievences as cannon fodder for promoting a more radical agenda. Just as the Muslim Brotherhood has successfully used the freedom aspirations of the Egyptian youth as the battering ram to bring down Mubarak and pave the way for radical Islamist hegemony, American Marxists/SEIU are organizing youth in order to crash the system and usher in their dystopic agenda.

  6. Pingback: Tony Rhodin is Very Confused about #OccupyWallStreet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s